Governance Quality, Organizational Legitimacy, and Stakeholder Trust: Lessons from FIFA Under Gianni Infantino

By Duclosel Global Governance Group (DGGG)

International sport organizations occupy a unique position at the intersection of governance, commerce, public trust, and global influence. Among them, FIFA stands as one of the world's most powerful institutions, governing the world's most popular sport, managing billions of dollars in commercial revenue, and overseeing competitions that unite nations across political, cultural, and economic boundaries.

Since assuming the FIFA presidency in 2016, Gianni Infantino has pursued an ambitious agenda centered on expanding football's global reach. Under his leadership, FIFA has expanded the FIFA World Cup from 32 to 48 teams, beginning with the 2026 tournament; expanded international competitions; strengthened commercial partnerships; and reported substantial financial growth. Supporters argue that these initiatives have broadened participation and generated additional resources for football development across FIFA's member associations.

At the same time, FIFA's direction has generated debate regarding governance quality, institutional legitimacy, stakeholder participation, organizational accountability, and the growing commercialization of international football. Rather than reducing these debates to the actions or personality of one leader, they present a broader governance question:

How does governance quality influence organizational legitimacy and stakeholder trust within FIFA under the leadership of Gianni Infantino?

Governance Beyond Financial Success

Financial performance alone does not determine whether an international sport organization is well governed. Modern sport governance requires institutions to balance strategic growth and organizational performance with transparency, accountability, ethical leadership, stakeholder participation, and effective oversight.

An organization may achieve substantial commercial success while simultaneously experiencing declining confidence among important stakeholders if major decisions are perceived as centralized, insufficiently transparent, or inadequately consultative.

For international sport organizations, legitimacy is therefore earned not only through successful tournaments, growing revenues, or global expansion but also through the credibility of the governance processes through which decisions are made.

This distinction is particularly important for organizations such as FIFA. Unlike a conventional private corporation, FIFA exercises regulatory and institutional authority over a global sport. Its decisions affect national associations, clubs, leagues, athletes, commercial partners, supporters, and governments. Consequently, organizational performance must be evaluated alongside governance quality.

Organizational Legitimacy as a Strategic Asset

Organizational legitimacy refers broadly to the extent to which an institution and its actions are perceived as appropriate and consistent with accepted norms, expectations, and values. In institutional theory, legitimacy is not merely reputational; it helps determine whether stakeholders accept an organization's authority and decisions.

For FIFA, legitimacy depends upon maintaining confidence among a diverse group of stakeholders, including:

• National football associations

• Continental confederations

• Professional clubs

• Domestic leagues

• Players

• Sponsors

• Broadcasters

• Supporters

• Governments

• Civil society organizations

These stakeholders do not necessarily share the same interests.

Players may emphasize welfare, recovery time, and scheduling. Clubs may prioritize player availability and competitive balance. National associations may emphasize development funding and representation. Sponsors and broadcasters may focus on audience reach and commercial stability. Supporters may prioritize accessibility, tradition, affordability, and competitive integrity.

The governance challenge is therefore not simply to satisfy every stakeholder. That would often be impossible. Rather, effective governance requires credible processes for balancing competing interests and demonstrating that significant decisions are made transparently, consistently, and in pursuit of legitimate organizational objectives.

The Importance of Stakeholder Trust

Stakeholder trust represents an important form of institutional capital.

Trust develops when stakeholders believe that organizational decisions are transparent, fair, consistently applied, evidence-informed, and aligned with the organization's stated objectives.

Conversely, trust can deteriorate when stakeholders perceive limited consultation, concentrated decision-making authority, inconsistent rule application, conflicts of interest, or insufficient explanation of major strategic decisions.

This distinction is particularly important in sport management because stakeholders may disagree with a decision while still accepting its legitimacy.

A club, player association, national federation, or supporter group may oppose a particular policy but nevertheless recognize the legitimacy of the decision if the process was transparent, inclusive, evidence-based, and governed by clearly established rules.

Governance quality therefore affects not only what organizations decide but also whether stakeholders trust the way they decide.

Governance and Strategic Expansion

Expansion has been a defining characteristic of FIFA's recent strategic direction.

The expansion of the men's World Cup to 48 teams and the enlarged FIFA Club World Cup demonstrate efforts to increase participation, global reach, commercial opportunities, and the international visibility of football.

Such expansion can create substantial benefits, including:

• Greater global participation

• Increased investment in football development

• Expanded commercial revenues

• Enhanced international visibility

• Greater representation for developing football nations

• New commercial and sporting opportunities

From a sport management perspective, these developments can be interpreted as strategic growth.

However, expansion also creates governance challenges.

These include increased pressure on athletes' welfare, competition calendar congestion, operational complexity, potential conflicts between international governing bodies and domestic competitions, and concerns about the balance between commercial objectives and sporting integrity.

The governance question is therefore not whether expansion is inherently positive or negative.

The more important question is whether the processes through which expansion occurs provide sufficient transparency, stakeholder participation, risk assessment, accountability, and consideration of long-term institutional consequences.

Good governance requires evaluating both the benefits of organizational growth and the risks it creates.

Transparency and Accountability

Transparency enables stakeholders to understand how and why institutional decisions are made. Accountability ensures that organizational leaders and governing bodies remain answerable for those decisions.

Within international sport organizations, effective transparency and accountability may include:

• Clearly articulated strategic objectives

• Public explanation of significant governance decisions

• Accessible governance policies and regulations

• Financial disclosure

• Independent oversight mechanisms

• Ethical review processes

• Effective conflict-of-interest management

• Transparent election and appointment procedures

• Mechanisms through which stakeholders can raise concerns

Transparency does not require that every internal deliberation become public. Nor does accountability mean that every controversial decision constitutes governance failure.

Rather, these principles establish mechanisms through which institutional authority can be exercised credibly and reviewed appropriately.

Such practices can strengthen stakeholder confidence even when disagreement over specific policies remains.

Organizational Culture Matters

Governance is shaped not only by formal statutes, committees, regulations, and policies but also by organizational culture.

Culture influences how formal governance mechanisms operate in practice.

An institution may possess sophisticated ethical rules and compliance structures, yet informal norms discourage dissent, limit accountability, or concentrate decision-making. Conversely, organizations that encourage dialogue, constructive criticism, institutional learning, and ethical leadership may strengthen their resilience even when formal systems require improvement.

Leadership therefore plays an important role in establishing organizational culture.

Leaders influence institutions through the priorities they establish, the behaviors they reward, the voices they include in decision-making, and the governance standards they model.

For FIFA and other international sport organizations, the long-term challenge is to ensure that good governance becomes institutionalized rather than dependent upon individual leaders.

Strong institutions should remain capable of maintaining accountability, transparency, and integrity regardless of who occupies executive office.

Measuring Governance Performance

International sport organizations should therefore evaluate success through a broader set of indicators than financial performance alone.

Traditional measures, such as revenue, sponsorship, broadcast audiences, tournament attendance, and commercial growth, remain important measures of organizational performance.

However, comprehensive governance assessment should also consider:

• Transparency of decision-making

• Effectiveness of accountability mechanisms

• Stakeholder participation

• Organizational integrity

• Ethical leadership

• Public and stakeholder confidence

• Athlete welfare

• Competitive integrity

• Financial sustainability

• Institutional independence

• Effectiveness of oversight

• Global development outcomes

Together, these indicators provide a more comprehensive picture of institutional performance.

A sport organization capable of generating substantial revenue but unable to sustain stakeholder trust may eventually encounter reputational, regulatory, operational, or legitimacy risks. Conversely, strong governance can become an organizational asset by strengthening institutional credibility and supporting sustainable strategic growth.

Implications for International Sport Governance

FIFA's experience illustrates a challenge extending far beyond football.

International federations, Olympic organizations, national governing bodies, professional leagues, and other sport institutions increasingly operate within complex environments characterized by significant commercial revenues, global media attention, political relationships, athlete activism, public scrutiny, and competing stakeholder interests.

These organizations therefore require governance systems capable of balancing organizational performance with institutional responsibility.

The central challenge facing modern sport governance is not choosing between commercial growth and institutional integrity.

The challenge is ensuring that growth occurs within governance systems that are transparent, accountable, participatory, ethically grounded, and institutionally resilient.

Good governance should not be regarded as an administrative constraint on sport organizations. Properly designed, it can become a strategic capability.

Organizations that establish credible governance systems are better positioned to manage risk, resolve stakeholder conflict, protect their reputations, attract commercial partners, maintain public confidence, and pursue sustainable long-term development.

Moving Forward

The debate surrounding FIFA under Gianni Infantino illustrates a broader reality confronting international sport organizations: sustainable success cannot be measured solely by financial growth, tournament expansion, or commercial reach. Governance quality remains fundamental to organizational legitimacy, stakeholder trust, and long-term institutional resilience.

As sport organizations continue to evolve within an increasingly complex global environment, leaders must ensure that commercial ambition is supported by governance systems that are transparent, accountable, participatory, and ethically grounded.

This requires more than adopting formal governance rules. Organizations must examine whether governance structures function effectively in practice, whether accountability mechanisms operate independently, whether stakeholders have meaningful opportunities to participate, and whether organizational culture reinforces the institution's stated values.

Institutions that successfully integrate these principles into their governance systems will be better positioned to maintain public confidence, navigate future challenges, and fulfill their broader responsibilities to athletes, supporters, member organizations, commercial partners, and society.

For policymakers, governing bodies, and sport executives alike, the path forward is clear: effective governance is not a constraint on organizational success; it is one of the foundations upon which sustainable success depends.

Author's Note

This article presents an analysis of governance principles using FIFA as a contemporary case study. It is intended to contribute to broader discussions on governance quality, organizational legitimacy, and stakeholder trust in international sport rather than to provide a comprehensive evaluation of any individual or organization. The analysis focuses primarily on institutional governance practices and their implications for sport management.

About DGGG

Duclosel Global Governance Group (DGGG) is a governance and public policy organization specializing in institutional integrity, anti-corruption, organizational reform, and accountable leadership. Through research, strategic insight, training, and advisory services, DGGG helps governments, public institutions, nonprofit organizations, and private-sector leaders translate integrity principles into sustainable governance structures and measurable results.

Research. Insight. Impact.

References

Chappelet, J.-L., & Mrkonjic, M. Basic Indicators for Better Governance in International Sport (BIBGIS): An Assessment Tool for International Sport Governing Bodies. Lausanne: IDHEAP, University of Lausanne.

Chelladurai, P. Managing Organizations for Sport and Physical Activity: A Systems Perspective. 4th ed. Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway, 2014.

Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA). FIFA Governance Regulations. Zurich: FIFA.

Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA). Annual Report 2024. Zurich: FIFA, 2025.

Henry, I., & Lee, P. C. "Governance and Ethics in Sport." In J. Beech & S. Chadwick (Eds.), The Business of Sport Management, 25–42. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2004.

Hoye, R., & Cuskelly, G. Sport Governance. London: Routledge.

Hoye, R., Misener, K., & Naraine, M. L. Sport Management: Principles and Applications. 6th ed. London: Routledge.

International Olympic Committee. Basic Universal Principles of Good Governance Within the Olympic Movement. Lausanne: IOC.

Parent, M. M., & Chappelet, J.-L., eds. Routledge Handbook of Sports Governance. London: Routledge, 2017.

Pedersen, P. M., & Thibault, L., eds. Contemporary Sport Management. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Suchman, M. C. "Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches." Academy of Management Review 20, no. 3 (1995): 571–610.