Governance Quality, Organizational Legitimacy, and Stakeholder Trust: Lessons from FIFA Under Gianni Infantino

By Duclosel Global Governance Group (DGGG)

International sport organizations occupy a unique position at the intersection of governance, commerce, public trust, and global influence. Among them, FIFA stands as one of the world's most powerful institutions, governing the most popular sport while managing billions of dollars in commercial revenues and overseeing competitions that unite nations across political, cultural, and economic boundaries.

Since assuming the FIFA presidency in 2016, Gianni Infantino has pursued an ambitious agenda centered on expanding football's global reach. Under his leadership, FIFA has increased the size of the FIFA World Cup, expanded international competitions, strengthened commercial partnerships, and reported record financial performance. Supporters argue that these initiatives have made football more inclusive and generated unprecedented resources for development across member associations.

At the same time, these initiatives have generated substantial debate regarding governance quality, institutional legitimacy, stakeholder participation, and organizational accountability. Rather than focusing on personalities, these debates present a broader governance question:

How does governance quality influence organizational legitimacy and stakeholder trust within FIFA under the leadership of Gianni Infantino?

Governance Beyond Financial Success

Financial performance alone does not determine whether an international organization is well governed. Modern governance requires institutions to balance strategic growth with transparency, accountability, ethical leadership, and meaningful stakeholder engagement.

An organization may achieve remarkable commercial success while simultaneously experiencing declining confidence among key stakeholders if major decisions appear centralized, insufficiently transparent, or inadequately consultative.

For international sport organizations, legitimacy is earned not only through successful tournaments but through the credibility of the decision-making processes that produce them.

Organizational Legitimacy as a Strategic Asset

Organizational legitimacy refers to the extent to which stakeholders perceive an institution's actions as appropriate, fair, and consistent with its stated mission and values.

For FIFA, legitimacy depends upon maintaining confidence among a diverse group of stakeholders, including:

• National football associations

• Continental confederations

• Professional clubs

• Domestic leagues

• Players

• Sponsors

• Broadcasters

• Supporters

• Governments

Each stakeholder group possesses different priorities. Players emphasize welfare and scheduling. Clubs focus on competitive balance and player availability. Sponsors seek brand protection. National associations prioritize development funding and representation. Effective governance requires balancing these competing interests through transparent and inclusive decision-making.

The Importance of Stakeholder Trust

Stakeholder trust is one of the most valuable forms of institutional capital.

Trust develops when stakeholders believe that decisions are:

• Transparent

• Fair

• Consistently applied

• Evidence-based

• Aligned with organizational objectives

Conversely, trust declines when stakeholders perceive limited consultation, concentrated authority, or insufficient explanation for major strategic decisions.

Recent debates surrounding competition expansion and commercial initiatives illustrate that organizational legitimacy depends not only on the outcome of decisions but also on the governance processes used to reach them.

Governance and Strategic Expansion

Expanding competitions can create significant opportunities.

Potential benefits include:

• Greater global participation.

• Increased investment in football development.

• Expanded commercial revenues.

• Enhanced international visibility.

• New opportunities for emerging football nations.

However, expansion also introduces governance challenges, including:

• Increased pressure on athlete welfare.

• Calendar congestion.

• Greater operational complexity.

• Balancing commercial objectives with sporting integrity.

• Maintaining equitable stakeholder representation.

Good governance requires evaluating both the strategic benefits and the institutional risks associated with growth.

Transparency and Accountability

Transparency enables stakeholders to understand how decisions are made, while accountability ensures that leaders remain answerable for those decisions.

Within international sport organizations, transparency may include:

• Clearly articulated strategic objectives.

• Public explanation of major governance decisions.

• Accessible governance policies.

• Independent oversight mechanisms.

• Ethical review processes.

• Effective conflict-of-interest management.

These practices strengthen confidence even when stakeholders disagree with particular outcomes.

Organizational Culture Matters

Governance is shaped not only by formal rules but also by organizational culture.

A culture that encourages dialogue, constructive criticism, institutional learning, and ethical leadership strengthens organizational resilience. Conversely, cultures characterized by excessive centralization or limited stakeholder engagement may weaken long-term institutional trust, regardless of short-term commercial success.

Leaders influence culture through the priorities they establish, the behaviors they reward, and the governance standards they model.

Measuring Governance Performance

International sport organizations should evaluate success using a balanced set of performance indicators rather than financial metrics alone.

A comprehensive governance assessment should consider:

• Transparency of decision-making.

• Accountability mechanisms.

• Stakeholder participation.

• Organizational integrity.

• Ethical leadership.

• Public confidence.

• Athlete welfare.

• Competitive integrity.

• Financial sustainability.

• Global development outcomes.

Together, these indicators provide a more complete picture of institutional performance.

Implications for International Sport Governance

FIFA's experience demonstrates that governance quality and organizational legitimacy are closely connected. As international sport organizations continue to expand commercially and strategically, sustaining stakeholder trust becomes increasingly important.

The challenge facing modern sport governance is not choosing between commercial growth and institutional integrity. Rather, it is ensuring that growth is supported by governance systems that are transparent, accountable, participatory, and ethically grounded.

Organizations that successfully balance these priorities are more likely to maintain legitimacy, preserve stakeholder confidence, and achieve sustainable long-term success.

Moving Forward

The debate surrounding FIFA under Gianni Infantino illustrates a broader reality confronting international sport organizations: sustainable success cannot be measured solely by financial growth or competitive expansion. Governance quality remains fundamental to organizational legitimacy, stakeholder trust, and long-term institutional resilience.

As sport organizations continue to evolve within an increasingly complex global environment, leaders must ensure that commercial ambition is supported by governance systems that are transparent, accountable, participatory, and ethically grounded. Institutions that successfully integrate these principles into their governance structures will be better positioned to maintain public confidence, navigate future challenges, and fulfill their broader responsibilities to athletes, supporters, and society.

For policymakers, governing bodies, and sport executives alike, the path forward is clear: effective governance is not a constraint on organizational success; it is one of its most enduring competitive advantages.

Author's Note

This article presents an analysis of governance principles using FIFA as a contemporary case study. The views expressed are intended to contribute to broader discussions on governance quality, organizational legitimacy, and stakeholder trust in international sport. The analysis focuses on institutional governance practices rather than on any individual. It is offered as a thought leadership piece to encourage evidence-informed dialogue on governance and integrity in sport.

About DGGG

Duclosel Global Governance Group (DGGG) is a governance and public policy organization specializing in institutional integrity, anti-corruption, organizational reform, and accountable leadership. Through research, strategic insight, training, and advisory services, DGGG helps governments, public institutions, nonprofit organizations, and private-sector leaders translate integrity principles into sustainable governance structures and measurable results. DGGG believes that integrity is not merely an ethical aspiration; it is a structural requirement for effective governance and sustainable institutional performance.

References

Chappelet, J.-L., & Mrkonjic, M. (2019). Basic Indicators for Better Governance in International Sport (BIBGIS): An Assessment Tool for International Sport Governing Bodies. Lausanne: IDHEAP, University of Lausanne.

Chelladurai, P. (2014). Managing Organizations for Sport and Physical Activity: A Systems Perspective (4th ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway.

Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA). (2024). FIFA Governance Regulations. Zurich, Switzerland: FIFA.

Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA). (2025). Annual Report 2024. Zurich, Switzerland: FIFA.

Henry, I., & Lee, P. C. (2004). Governance and ethics in sport. In J. Beech & S. Chadwick (Eds.), The Business of Sport Management (pp. 25–42). Harlow, England: Pearson Education.

Hoye, R., & Cuskelly, G. (2021). Sport Governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Hoye, R., Misener, K., & Naraine, M. L. (2024). Sport Management: Principles and Applications (6th ed.). London: Routledge.

International Olympic Committee. (2022). Basic Universal Principles of Good Governance of the Olympic and Sports Movement. Lausanne, Switzerland: IOC.

Parent, M. M., & Chappelet, J.-L. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Sport Governance. London: Routledge.

Pedersen, P. M., & Thibault, L. (2023). Contemporary Sport Management (7th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Shilbury, D., Ferkins, L., & Smythe, L. (2020). Sport governance encounters: Insights from lived experiences. Journal of Sport Management, 34(5), 481–493.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

World Bank. (2017). World Development Report 2017: Governance and the Law. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Research. Insight. Impact.